you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you—although if you can gain your Freedom, do so. 1 Cor
Why do we assume scientists are always right? It seems we are being scammed by some of the shiftiest salesmen
on the planet beginning with their most questionable foundation of evolution. While they are intimidating and ridiculing Christians for their belief in an all powerful God, they are
promoting a theory that has not made any progress in over a hundred and fifty years. This failure happened in spite of every
scientist on the planet attempting to discover the holy grail of science, that elusive missing link between monkey and man.
invented this theory by the logical observations that every animal and plant seems to have a similarity and connection making
an obvious chain from one animal to the next. His theory as everyone knows has life beginning randomly in a primordial soup
forming the first life forms billions of years ago. Never mind this huge hole in the theory of how life could be formed in
a soup that was previously sterilized at over a thousand degrees, you just accept it without explanation or even the slightest
bit of logic. This crater is so big that the Darwinists eliminated it from their discussion and saying how it occurred is
no longer part of evolution which is like saying starting the car has nothing to do with your destination?
In 1859 Darwin questioned
his own theory in his book Origin of Species when he wrote, ” ...as this process of extermination [survival of the fittest]
has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed on the earth, be
truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which
can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record.”
he asked that question in today’s scientific community he would be called a denier and would be tossed out of the scientific
community. After a century and a half it should be time for the scientific community to answer that basic question. Shouldn’t
these archeologists be swimming in transitory species’ fossils yet they have not found any which can be confirmed.
if you simply ask the question of where life began you will soon be vilified and called a Bible thumping Neanderthal or as
they would call it, the missing link. From the magic of life appearing forward evolutionists are very comfortable, since life
forms have a continuity they can observe and theorize. First there were bacteria which formed into amoeba’s which evolved
into plankton and then fish since they all occur in the ocean and live as well as adapt similarly to each other. There are no explanations of how
or why they simply changed from single cells into fish other than you simply need to have faith in random defects turning
into superior species rather than inferior or that it can be repeated, you just accept it.
The next step of evolution is moving from the ocean and onto the land which of course was the evolution of whales and whale type creatures
which eventually became reptiles. The reptiles ruled the earth as dinosaurs for millions and millions of years until a random
ice age happened which wiped them out instantly. This is where it becomes dicey since they are not sure the mammals developed
while the dinosaurs were eating them and vice versa since the evolution from reptile to mammal is such a giant leap. Once
again we have no transitory species or fossils of those species which makes you have to wonder why no examples of these defective
reptiles becoming pure land creatures. You simply take another scientific leap of faith.
The other problem the
Darwinists have is where is the missing link? During the early 20th century there was something the scientists called the
evolutionary ladder that led to modern man. It began with Nebraska man (fraud) to Peking man (fraud) to Piltdown man (fraud)
to Neanderthal (fraud) and then man began walking fully upright. Once that happened then they used their scientific brilliance
and made the Black man into one of the lower man evolutions followed by Asian through Slavic, Gypsy, Jew, and then Aryan being
the highest form of man which they then attempted to make a super race leading to gas chambers and ovens to purify the race.
Good thing science has given up on that evolutionary idea.
Once again science was wrong as it moved away from
simple curiosity and investigation and into an agenda driven science and has not moved from there since that time. For any
scientist there would have to be millions and millions of transitory species moving from Ape to man, yet not one scientist
has found a credible fossil. The evolutions from the ape to man has to have as many separate species as from reptile to ape,
yet nothing. Every scientist knows if she finds this fossil she will have instant immortality as they have finally proved
God a fake…er…evolution is true. Even the most basic logic has to tell you if they know where modern man first
began in Iran on the Euphrates in the simplest of digging areas there should be a sea of those transitional ape/man species
and yet they have not found any. Why? There is only one logical answer and that is that man did not evolve from the Great
Apes but came from somewhere else. If there were millions of evolutions between Ape and Man which would take more evolutions
than moving from amoeba to ape, it is statistically impossible for scientists to not find at least one! The odds have to be
billions and billions to one not to find one of these missing links, yet that is exactly what has happened in over a hundred
and fifty years of searching.
It really makes you wonder when science began losing its curiosity of the unknown. There had to be
a time when science was as eager to disprove their theories as they are now to perpetuate their frauds? If they have not come
up with a credible missing link by this time then what stops them from discarding the entire theory. Sure it is easy to say
an amoeba looks like a fish and a lizard walking out of the water looks like a mammal. Then of course the Disney movie continues
as a dog looks like a horse and when they go up on two legs the can go from monkey to ape to man, but did that actually happen?
There is no proof that is what happened which is the giant hole in the theory they have to fill with consensus, intimidation
and purging rather than evidence.
The giant question that is not allowed to be asked is, was life formed by a chain of events making
them look similar and have continuity or did that similarity occur at creation? Did science actually invent a theory of our
creation or are they simply observing the miraculous continuity of a perfect creator? These are questions science does not
want to ask and are beginning to fear the answers. Why won’t today’s scientists ask the same logical question
Darwin asked, "why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?"